POW Not A Qualification For POTUS
Monday, June 30th, 2008
The political world is abuzz over General Wesley Clark’s recent comments about John McCain’s qualifications for President of the United States of America. Clark stated the obvious - being a POW does not qualify you to be President. The McCain camp has responded with faux outrage over the ‘questioning’ of Senator McCain’s military service in an attempt to dodge the issue of his presidential bonafides.
Clark, former NATO supreme allied commander, said McCain’s combat experience as a fighter pilot did not make him more qualified to be president than Democratic candidate Barack Obama.
“Well, I don’t think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be president,” he said.
Speaking the truth, it seems, can be just as much a political gaffe as telling a lie. Why is everyone responding with shock and outrage over a simple statement of fact?
John McCain has made his POW experience an issue in this campaign by running ads suggesting that it somehow qualifies him to be President. This false assertion begs to be repudiated. Unless Senator McCain can somehow explain why being shot down and taken prisoner qualifies one to be President, he needs to be called on his shameless ploy to garner sympathy votes.
Stating the obvious - that being a POW is not a qualification for POTUS - does not equate to questioning and disrespecting Senator McCain’s military service. I’m glad that someone finally had the cajones to call McCain’s bluff.
To use McCain’s own words, being a POW “…certainly doesn’t do anything to address the challenges that Americans have in keeping their jobs, homes and supporting their families.”





